Feature Article
Work & Life out now



The Autumn/Winter edition of Work & Life  magazine is now on its way to workplaces and subscribers. In the latest edition, on work,  we look at the uncertainty created by Brexit, the Public Service Pay Commission, women’s voices on the front pages and a legal review of pregnancy and the workplace. And in life, we have features on travel in Croatia, sourdough bread, author Cat Hogan and Raymond Connolly’s Brexit lament, plus the usual mix of union news, competitions, fashion, gardens and more.


additional articles
CORU – Statutory registration update on website
IMPACT’s website has updated the information in relation to statutory registration for individual health and social care professionals.

Statutory registration means that individual health and social care professionals will have to apply to be accepted onto a professional register before they are permitted to practise, or continue to practise in Ireland. CORU is the statutory registration body for this.

The IMPACT website gives information on which professionals are required to register; the dates for the opening of these registers; what the registration fee is; what does compulsory registration mean in the practise of the profession; continuing professional development and dealing with fitness to practise complaints.

In a separate development the Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists (ISCP) has sought IMPACT’s support as it directs its members not to register with the new physiotherapy register under CORU, due to a dispute with the Minister for Health, Simon Harris TD. IMPACT has requested that physiotherapist members do not register with CORU while the dispute is ongoing. See news story in this e-bulletin.

Demonstration - Education is taking to the streets
by Lughan Deane

The Coalition for Publicly Funded Higher Education (of which IMPACT is a member) is supporting a demonstration on Wednesday the 19th of October to call on the Irish government and the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Education and Skills to make a historic long-term decision and invest in the publicly-funded third level education model as outlined in the Cassells report.

This demonstration follows the allocation in last week’s budget of an additional €36.5 million to the third level sector - which, while welcome, is insufficient. Annie Hoey, USI President said that “The status quo isn’t working. Third level education is unaffordable and our universities are slipping down on the QS World University Rankings”.

The demonstration begins at the Garden of Remembrance at 1pm on Wednesday the 19th of October. IMPACT staff or members who plan on attending should meet at reception in IMPACT HQ at 12.30pm or at the Garden of Remembrance at 12.50 pm. They should also contact Joe O’Connor at joconnor@impact.ie to confirm their attendance in advance.

Special needs assistants/NCSE review
by Martina O'Leary

The Minister for Education Mr. Richard Bruton tasked the National Council for Special Education (NCSE) to undertake a comprehensive review of the special needs assistants scheme.

Essentially what the review will focus on is whether the SNA scheme continues to meet its purpose as set out in circular 0030/2014. It will look, too, into the training levels of SNAs along with qualifications in other areas.

The review will also focus on the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Education and Social Protection in January 2016.

IMPACT were asked to nominate four SNAs from across primary, post primary, special schools and a mainstream school with ASD units. The nominees met with the NCSE on Monday October 10th and answered a range of questions specific to both the scheme and the various school settings.

It is important to note that the report produced by the Joint Oireachtas committee chaired by Senator Mary Moran was published in January 2016 and some of its recommendations were pertaining to continuous professional development (CPD) and the need to review the entry requirements of SNA’s going forward.

IMPACT has been informed that the NCSE will be requesting a meeting with the union’s Deputy General Secretary Kevin Callinan and Assistant General Secretary Barry Cunningham in the very near future to partake in the review.

ASTI dispute
School Secretaries, Caretakers and Special Needs Assistants
by Barry Cunningham

We have been advised by ASTI that their members have been directed to take strike action on up to seven dates in 2016 and that pickets will be placed on all schools, colleges and education centres where ASTI members are employed on the day.

In such situations members of unions other than those involved in the dispute are expected to work normally. This is fully understood by ASTI taking action and the reverse would apply if IMPACT were the union in dispute. Therefore, in accordance with standard Congress procedures you should attend for work as normal unless you are directed by your employer to remain at home. Under no circumstances should you undertake any work or duties that would normally be done by any of ASTI members on strike.

We do of course wish our ASTI colleagues well in their efforts to achieve a resolution.

NEWS
Physiotherapists urged not to register with CORU
by Niall Shanahan
 
The Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists (ISCP) has sought IMPACT’s support as it directs its members not to register with the new physiotherapy register under CORU, due to a dispute with the Minister for Health, Simon Harris TD. IMPACT has requested that physiotherapist members do not register with CORU while the dispute is ongoing.
The Irish Society of Chartered Physiotherapists (ISCP) has sought IMPACT’s support as it directs its members not to register with the new physiotherapy register under CORU, due to a dispute with the Minister for Health, Simon Harris TD. IMPACT has requested that physiotherapist members do not register with CORU while the dispute is ongoing.

In a statement, the ISCP explained the background to the dispute, which concerns the protection of the title of physiotherapist and physical therapist: “The ISCP had been seeking assurances from the Minister for Health, Simon Harris, that he intended to fully implement the decision taken by his predecessor, Leo Varadkar, in January 2016 to protect both titles of physiotherapist and physical therapist as a variant in the one register.

“However, an update from Minister Harris has caused huge alarm and has the potential to allow anyone who has called themselves a physical therapist or a physiotherapist, regardless of their qualification, to gain access to the register.

“This is deemed completely unacceptable and poses a huge risk to public safety. In addition this opens the State to potential huge legal liabilities and costs. Ireland is currently out of step with the rest of the world and is the only country where both titles are not protected for the one profession.”

IMPACT national secretary Eamonn Donnelly said the issue came to light just as the register was due to open at the end of September. “It now appears that the issue is unresolved based on an exchange of correspondence between ISCP and the Minister. The ISCP has asked for IMPACT’s support on this issue, which is why we are now directing our physiotherapist members not to register with CORU.

“We are as one with the ISCP on this issue, and until we’re satisfied that this issue has been fully addressed, we will ask our members not to register. IMPACT will engage in discussions with ISCP and will offer further advice to members as things develop,” he said.

Digitalisation of Work
by Lughan Deane
 
NIALL SHANAHAN, IMPACT’s Communications Officer, attended the European Foundation’s seminar series on the digitalisation of work in Berlin. He was there, representing ICTU as part of the Irish Tripartite team, to provide a trade union perspective on the changing nature of work. This blog, compiled from his joint submission to the Foundation as well as a recent Work & Life article by LUGHAN DEANE entitled ‘The Future of Work - Sharing the Load’ explores some of the challenges that the sharing economy poses for trade unions.

NIALL SHANAHAN, IMPACT’s Communications Officer, attended the European Foundation’s seminar series on the digitalisation of work in Berlin. He was there, representing ICTU as part of the Irish Tripartite team, to provide a trade union perspective on the changing nature of work. This blog, compiled from his joint submission to the Foundation as well as a recent Work & Life article by LUGHAN DEANE entitled ‘The Future of Work - Sharing the Load’ explores some of the challenges that the sharing economy poses for trade unions.

It’s only when the capitalist system is pushed to within an inch of its life and its bloated financial institutions are stripped back by crisis that the system’s underlying lean, muscular dynamism is revealed. Its post-2008 reaction to the west’s tentative flirtations with alternative systems of social organization provided a perfect illustration of its original appeal. Rather than struggling against the socialist rhetoric of movements like Occupy, the capitalist system incorporated it. It commodified the dissent that existed against it. It brought opposing forces into its own logical framework. It allowed a little of its enemy in. In other words, it inoculated itself against the potential for a real attack.

The result of this process of self-inoculation is the so-called sharing economy, the most recent frontier of modern capitalism. In developing the sharing economy, the capitalist system hit upon an adaptation that resolved the three great risks to its survival as  brought about by the 2008 financial crisis. At once it inoculated itself against growing left-wing dissent with its emphasis on ‘sharing’ and ‘community’, it invented platform-based busy-work to occupy the armies of newly unemployed workers and it found a way to re-commodify all the excess product that had been accumulated by consumers during nearly two decades of economic boom just as consumption ground to a halt. 

The real genius of the sharing economy is that it commodifies the aesthetic of socialism without ever coming close to adopting the system. By re-appropriating the left-wing rhetoric of the trade union or cooperative, the sharing economy at once neutralises the threat of alternative worldviews and advances its own brand of aggressive, dynamic capitalism.

The digitalisation of work and the evolution of a (global) digital economy create specific challenges and opportunities in terms of industrial relations and legislation. The employer / employee relationship is changing. Platform work means workers from countries with high levels of social protection are brought into competition with those from countries with low levels of protection.

From a trade union perspective, the potential for these platforms to radically reorganise labour markets is a concern. It raises questions about the potential casualisation of work as platform workers are forced to bid for work and establish themselves as self-employed; the potential for ‘invisible’ outsourcing of work to third parties and; the potential to create a new ‘black economy’; the transfer of all risk and costs from employer to employee; the loss of standard provisions for social security and the absence of collectively bargained terms and conditions.

Traditional unions as they are currently configured will struggle to operate in the context of the sharing economy. On the one hand, people act as independent micro-entrepreneurs in competition with one another and so are disincentivized from organising. While, on the other, private contractors who do organize to agree on acceptable terms and conditions of employment could be accused of price fixing and forming an illegal cartel. For these reasons, many have seen the sharing economy as an attempt (polished by slick PR) to bypass a body of employment and workplace law that has been built up over decades.

Platform work has the potential to unravel decades of worker protections fought for by trade unions and delivered, in more recent times, by the EU.

In the world of precarious employment, the virtues of ‘flexibility’ are underwritten by low pay, high pressure and a backdrop of uncertainty, all borne by the worker providing the service. If the digital platforms are to become a more fully integrated employment option, then the principle of quality employment - a decent wage, occupational health and safety provision, acceptable working conditions, opportunities for training and promotion; and standardised and transparent employment contracts - must apply.

The challenge for trade unions is to develop a deeper understanding of the emerging forms of work, and to position themselves to become a resource for the workers engaged in these employments.

Trade unions provided the very first form of networking between workers and the trade union movement has successfully navigated workers through other phases of radical transformation and evolutions in the modern workplace. We are at a point where we need to be able to continue that process in an environment that is changing more rapidly than ever before.

Renting is not  and can never be sharing. The good news is that there is a real, functioning sharing economy already in existence - it’s called the public sector. A public library, a park, or a swimming pool are all examples of an actual collaborative economy. Through taxes we pool resources and invest in services that we all get to use - a true sharing economy.

Union sub tax break sought
by Bernard Harbor
 
IMPACT has vowed to continue its campaign for the reinstatement of tax relief for trade union subscriptions. Reacting to Budget 2017, the union’s general secretary Shay Cody said it was unfair that relatively high-paid professionals get tax relief for joining a professional body, while low paid workers got no relief on their trade union subs.

IMPACT has vowed to continue its campaign for the reinstatement of tax relief for trade union subscriptions. Reacting to Budget 2017, the union’s general secretary Shay Cody said it was unfair that relatively high-paid professionals get tax relief for joining a professional body, while low paid workers got no relief on their trade union subs.

It’s 15 years since IMPACT successfully lobbied for the introduction of tax relief on trade union fees, which was introduced in 2001. However, it was abolished by then-Finance Minister Brian Lenihan ten years later. Despite saying that tax relief for subscriptions to professional bodies would also be abolished, much of that benefit remains in place.

In October 2015, then-ministers Brendan Howlin and Michael Noonan promised a review and consultation on the matter. Meanwhile, IMPACT continued to lobby for union subs to be treated no less favourably than professional subscriptions.

After the 2016 general election, the new Government dispensed with the public consultation. Instead, an internal Department of Finance review concluded that restoration of tax relief for trade union subs was not justified.

Shay said: “With the change in Government, there is nobody around the cabinet table arguing for the unfair and anti-union status quo to be addressed. It’s hardly a surprise that, in the absence of political will, Department of Finance officials recommended against treating trade union members in the same way as accountants and solicitors. Its review contains many inaccuracies, although it does highlight the fact that trade union subs are tax deductible in countries like Canada and Australia. This one hasn’t gone away.”

Email Newsletter Software by Newsweaver